You must be *fucking* kidding me
Jul. 16th, 2008 02:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Thank you
redhotlips and
much_ado for posting this.
If you care *at all* about protecting your rights to birth control, the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy ... read this and write your representatives ... this is oversteps all boundaries on individual rights, particularly for women.
Here is a copy of the full article
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
If you care *at all* about protecting your rights to birth control, the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy ... read this and write your representatives ... this is oversteps all boundaries on individual rights, particularly for women.
In a spectacular act of complicity with the religious
right, the Department of Health and Human Services Monday released a
proposal that allows any federal grant recipient to obstruct a woman's
access to contraception. In order to do this, the Department is
attempting to redefine many forms of contraception, the birth control
40% of Americans use, as abortion. [...]
Up until now, the [US]
federal government followed the definition of pregnancy accepted by the
American Medical Association and our nation's pregnancy experts, the
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which is:
pregnancy begins at implantation. With this proposal, however, HHS is dismissing medical experts and opting instead to accept a definition of pregnancy based on polling data.
It now claims that pregnancy begins at some biologically unknowable
moment (there's no test to determine if a woman's egg has been
fertilized). Under these new standards there would be no way for a
woman to prove she's not pregnant. Thus, any woman could be denied
contraception under HHS' new science.
Here is a copy of the full article
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 07:10 pm (UTC)